by both I meant 3.5/3.6. I would avoid 3.7 until it goes final (or even wait for 3.7.1/2)
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Xavier Ducrohet <x...@android.com> wrote: > both should be ok. Early versions are always a bit buggy, but 3.6.1/2 > should work better than straight 3.6 > That said 3.5.2 works fine. Make sure you get a simple version > (Eclipse for Java dev for instance). No need to get one that has a lot > of useless plug-ins. > > Xav > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Nathan <critter...@crittermap.com> wrote: >> I probably to reinstall Eclipse, so I wanted soem advice on teh best >> version. >> >> I've had 3.4. >> >> Some comments from others at Andevcon suggest that performance gets >> worse with 3.6 and 3.7. So is 3.5 Classic the best ever? >> >> Thanks >> >> Nathan >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Android Developers" group. >> To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en >> > > > > -- > Xavier Ducrohet > Android SDK Tech Lead > Google Inc. > http://developer.android.com | http://tools.android.com > > Please do not send me questions directly. Thanks! > -- Xavier Ducrohet Android SDK Tech Lead Google Inc. http://developer.android.com | http://tools.android.com Please do not send me questions directly. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
