That's the main reason why I put it in the manifest. Because when I make a
build, I am changing the version number, version name, whatsnew text and
other stuff anyway and so also having the Market type there means it's not
easily missed.

On 9 August 2011 12:00, Nikolay Elenkov <nikolay.elen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:32 AM, TreKing <treking...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Nikolay Elenkov <
> nikolay.elen...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> You need to have two different builds: one for the Android
> Market, another
> >> for the Amazon App Store. Use a library projects for the core and two
> app
> >> projects with different string resources for the rating/app link URL's.
> >
> > You don't even have to go that far. One static flag is all you need.
>
> If the Market URL is the only difference between the two builds, a flag
> could be sufficient, yes. That leaves the possibility of human error
> though: you can forget to flip the flag, and upload the wrong binary.
> And with my latest update to the Amazon market being 'reviewed'
> for about a week now, despite being a minor update, I'd like to
> avoid that as much as possible.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Android Developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to