My guess is it was this page: http://openideals.com/what-im-known-for/ They
may have thought you were selling or allowing the download of applications,
which violates Google's non-compete clause.

Shane

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> You mention the word "Demo", do you have a "Click here to pay" link?, if
> so that'll be the problem. Apps on Market have to have all their
> payments handled by the (currently non-existent) Market payment
> processing system.
>
> Al.
> http://andappstore.com/
>
> Nathan Freitas wrote:
> > I've got a full post up here about this (http://openideals.com/
> > 2009/01/07/android-market-suspends-my-blog-app/) but I'll copy the
> > text in here for your convenience....
> >
> > Earlier today, I was gleefully attempting to show a friend the
> > hilarious comment thread for the blog app I recently released for
> > Android. I pulled up the Market app on my T-Mobile G1 and searched for
> > "Nathan", expecting to see "Nathan's Blog App" in the results…. but,
> > it wasn't there. Confusion set in for a bit, followed by disbelief
> > that the app had been removed from the store.
> >
> > This was confirmed when I received this "friendly" automated note
> > below from the Android Market support team:
> >
> >     [email protected]
> >     6:24 PM (5 hours ago)
> >
> >     This is a notification that the application Nathan's Blog App Demo
> > (ID: -8575230491255129376) has been removed from Android Market due to
> > a violation of the Developer Content Policy. Please review the Content
> > Policies and Business and Program Policies before you create or upload
> > additional applications.
> >
> >     For more information, or to contact us, please visit the Android
> > Market Help Center.
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     The Android Market Team
> >
> > Now if you look through the policy links, and then read about what my
> > app does, you'll see that, as far as I can tell, I am in no way
> > breaking the rules.
> >
> >     Your application shouldn't contain content that displays (via
> > text, images, video or other media) or links to:
> >
> >     * illegal content
> >     * invasions of personal privacy or violations of the right of
> > publicity
> >     * content that interferes with the functioning of any services of
> > other parties
> >     * promotions of hate or incitement of violence
> >     * violations of intellectual property rights, including patent,
> > copyright (see DMCA policy), trademark, trade secret, or other
> > proprietary right of any party
> >     * any material not suitable for persons under 18
> >     * pornography, obscenity, nudity or sexual activity
> >
> >     Also, make sure your products don't:
> >
> >     * harm user devices or personal data.
> >     * create unpredictable network usage that has an adverse impact on
> > a user's service charges or a Authorized Carrier's network.
> >     * knowingly violate an Authorized Carrier's terms of service for
> > allowed usage
> >
> > Now, I'll admit my app is a bit pointless, some may mistake it as
> > shameless self-promotion, but in truth, it was meant as a proof of
> > concept for gluing together the awesome Phonegap SDK (a mobile web
> > appstack enabler) with Wordpress and a mobile-friendly template. This
> > allows my CMS-based website (be it blog or not) to have a "native"
> > presence on a device, one click launch capability AND allow for
> > integration with native services like GPS, media capture,
> > accelerometer and more. Pretty cool, eh?
> >
> > I guess apparently not. I ask you out there to tell me why *you* think
> > my app was removed. Perhaps I will hear back from Google… not sure.
> > Their "Contact Us" capability was pretty basic and I had to dig for
> > it… considering the notification email came from a "no-reply" address,
> > I am not very hopeful. I am going to post this blog link to the
> > appropriate developer lists, as well, and I look forward to gaining
> > some insight into what I may have done wrong, though I honestly
> > believe I am not at fault here.
> >
> > Regardless, isn't Android supposed to the more "open" platform? I
> > thought app censorship was the domain of Apple?! Is there some sort of
> > review process that happens after an app is released? Why not do this
> > before the app even gets into the market… that way at least you know
> > where you stand before you tell the world the app is up. Maybe the
> > Apple way isn't so bad after all…
> >
> > Anyhow, for one of the biggest cheerleaders of Android out there, this
> > is not a fun moment.
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> ======
> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> subsidiaries.
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to