Clarifying one sentence.... On Friday, November 9, 2012 4:52:34 PM UTC-5, AndyD wrote: > > I've got a RelativeLayout declared via XML that contains a regular View > and a ViewStub. The regular View specifies > android:layout_above="@+id/the_view_stub". In my Fragment's > onCreateView(), I'm first inflating the RelativeView, then conditionally > inflating the stub. However, the result is that the view that replaces the > stub upon its inflation is overlaying the "regular" view, instead of being > positioned below it. > > When I substitute the stub's "target" layout directly into the > RelativeLayout in the XML file (i.e. no stub, no conditional inflation), it > works as expected. > > At first, I thought maybe the problem was that the inflated view that > replaced the ViewStub had a different ID than the stub, such that *during > the layout calculations*, the first view in the RelativeLayout was still > referencing the ID of the stub (which would no longer exist); however, > making the IDs of the stub and its target the same, via android:inflatedId, > didn't make any difference. > > Then, I thought maybe I needed to call requestLayout() on the > RelativeLayout after stub inflation, but that didn't make a difference, > either. > > Ideas? >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
