That's fine, I'll check whether this work and get back to list tonight. On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Mariano Kamp <mariano.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > I suppose that you would at least have to specify the name of e.g. > activities fully qualified then. Instead of .SomeActivity you would then > need to specify x.y.z.SomeActivity. > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Stoyan Damov <stoyan.da...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I'm very interested in getting a confirmation on this. >> Romain, are you saying that my apk can contain classes in the package >> X.Y.Z but in the manifest I can say the package is really A.B.C? >> >> Thanks >> >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Mariano Kamp <mariano.k...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > So, you're saying that the package name in the manifest is not related >> > to the source package name. That would be cool and would make it much >> > easier to provide a lite and full version of the same app. >> > >> > On Mar 10, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Romain Guy wrote: >> > >> >> All you need is change the package name in the AndroidManifest. >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> > > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
