Hi It's the first time i release application in Android. My app is ClapCard (in market i submit it as Clap Card, because when using ClapCard title it said the app has already exist, maybe they compared to the app in adc2 too....)
I started 3 months ago, doing the app in my free time (i have full time job and part time job). it's a 3 months with less sleep (averagely 5 hours sleep) Glady i made it in time to submit my app. My app is a social type. It's about creating and sharing animated card. It's not like cards in web site tough, because it uses phones cappabilities like web, map, vibration, sms, email, etc. Because this is my first release, this morning i submitted it to the market hoping that people like it and can create and posting cards to make it more crowded in community. I myself posted 2 cards only, still has a lot of works to do the tutorial page in website (www.clapcard.com) It's a real fun experience to do all the stuff since this is my first app available for public ^^ I'm planning to make a puzzle like game after completing the website. (will be my first experience creating game too...) On Sep 2, 1:32 pm, JP <joachim.pfeif...@gmail.com> wrote: > Augmented Reality. I've got a comp ed of AugmentThis! in the running. > > This round I didn't stress over the ADC, for a number of reasons, not > the least that PURE LUCK will play a big role again. So I got the > release candidate ready about a week before deadline. Of course > there's always room to squeeze in new features and apply more polish. > Like all dedicated devs I will remain eternally unhappy with the > product, but assuming that the evaluators will not sniff out all the > corners anyway, I spent the rest of the time testing, which turned out > to be a good use of the remaining time. > > Two remarks: > As -v- has found, it takes a long time to get Android dialed and is > decidedly challenging, in spite of the cheerful assurances in the > various videos on Android's Google Code page. Seemingly trivial things > can consume huge amounts of effort. Which isn't a problem, Android is > powerful, with broad and deep access to the devices' capabilities (in > case you haven't noticed). > > Re: CraigsRace's comment: If the ADC1 is any indication, placing above > average won't get any exposure whatsoever. > > On Sep 1, 7:41 am, Lout <lout.r...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > While you developers relax... would you mind sharing what apps to > > expect through this challenge.. and anything else you wish to share > > about ADC2 submissions... well anything including the fact: 'thank > > God, no more sleep less nights'! > > > Am collecting information about the challenge (ADC2) for a news > > article as am with cnet (and AP). Pitch your app if you have already > > published or would soon publish on the market too. > > > Your app name and description, web link if any, experience with > > ADC2, ... anything would be useful for our article(s). > > > And do you feel that there would have been more submissions than in > > ADC1? > > Is the competition going to be tougher or less profound as you were > > allowed to put up apps not published before 1st Aug only? > > > Do you think that all apps that didn't try for ADC1 should have had a > > chance? > > > Congratulations on your submissions while you wait for the next > > phase. > > Thanks, > > Lout Reilly > > ps: Moderators we request you to let this through so that you too get > > some feedback. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
