Your main thrust is about battery drain. Is your assumption that an
application that is not shut down will drain the battery really valid?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Kevin Duffey <andjar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't know if I like this model. :D I'll give you one reason that I don't
> know if it comes up or exists often, but I think it's one of the most
> confusing issues for non-techie (and even techie peeps that don't know about
> programming and threads and such) users for android devices. The problem to
> me is.. I am a developer that will without a doubt make mistakes. As such,
> if I am writing an app that otherwise seems to run fine on devices, but I've
> forgotten to stop threads when my app is paused (either by user hitting
> home/back, phone call, etc).. to the users, my app may be finished. The
> notion of not closing down an app and users getting used to that idea means
> that they need to trust every app they ever get that it wont leave some
> battery draining possibility running behind. Now, Mark I know will correct
> me if I am wrong here, I've read his first book mostly and other books on
> Android. It is up to us in every Activity to handle the pause/resume,
> create(bundle) to resume properly if the app was actually shut down and
> bundle info saved, etc. But I still can't help to think that there are thos
> eapps that have "bugs" in them that have either a thread left behind
> (assuming android doesn't completely shut it down) that may end up draining
> the battery. I don't know for sure, but a few times now, I've come back to
> my phone a couple hours later to find it dead, from a completely charged
> state prior. And I don't know why. My only guess is that I left something
> running, like google maps with wifi that I thought was stopped/shut down
> cause I hit the home/back button. Being a developer I know it's probably in
> a paused state, but this battery drain thing has happened a few times.
>
> Thus, my thought is.. to avoid my app possibly draining the battery, I'd
> rather have a quit option to exit the app completely.. it's done, unloaded,
> no threads, etc. Now on iPhone, it's well known that presently pressing the
> one button kills the apps. The apps have the option to save state info
> before shutting down, and some apps make good use of this to make it look
> like it never shut down.. restoring the user to where they were previously
> at. Most iPhone apps dont do this tho. So the thing is, this not shutting
> apps down completely is a different mind set that I honestly am surprised we
> would want to program to as developers concerned about battery drainage. I
> would think since one of the most important things when writting android
> apps is to consider battery life, would be to do everything we can to shut
> our app down if the user hits the exit button. Sure, if they hit back/home,
> or a call comes in or they go to status bar and select something, the
> pause/resume notion kicks in. But I am having a hard time understand why you
> would not want to put in an exit/quit option and cleanly shut down
> everything if they choose this? I do see some games on Android doing this.
>
> So Mark et all, I understand the basics of what you are saying and for some
> apps this makes perfect sense. But some, like games or those that may spawn
> threads or do other cpu intensive things that could drain battery especially
> if done in threads, it seems to me to be safe and keep our ratings of our
> apps form going down to 1 star, we'd want to program defensively and make
> sure our app shuts down completely.
>
> Just my .02 on the matter.
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Vladimir <vladimir.funti...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> "But my question is "Why does user has to wait till android closes
>> particular application, Instead why doesn't user do this"?"
>>
>> Because this is how it is done in Android. If you change it, users
>> will get confused and eventually annoyed.
>>
>> On Jan 21, 3:58 pm, pink 444 <pnk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks for your replay.
>> >
>> > And i went through the link , which you specified.
>> >
>> > As i understood process will be killed by android only.
>> >
>> >  But my question is "Why does user has to wait till android closes
>> > particular application, Instead why doesn't user do this"?
>> >
>> > Instead of waiting till android system cleans all the resources used
>> > by the application , It is more efficient if user able to clean all
>> > the resources used by the application. Especially it is useful in
>> > embedded environment like mobiles.
>> >
>> > If you take any game and user does not have any option to close the
>> > game . Then the application has to wait for android system to clean
>> > resources , which are owned by the application. But these type of
>> > applications are not used by the user regularly(Generally Once in a
>> > day or week).
>> >
>> > On Jan 21, 3:06 pm, "Mark Murphy" <mmur...@commonsware.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > >     In my application i have to close the application.
>> >
>> > > No, you don't.
>> >
>> > > >     Hence i am using System.exit(1).
>> >
>> > > Please do not do this.
>> >
>> > > >     But some times it is trying to restart entire application.
>> >
>> > > >     What is the problem?
>> >
>> > > You are trying to close the application. Please do not do this.
>> >
>> > > If you want to simply close up an activity, the activity can call
>> finish().
>> >
>> > > >      How can i close an application safely?
>> >
>> > > You do not need to:
>> >
>> > >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2033914/quitting-an-application-is.
>> ..
>> >
>> > > --
>> > > Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)http://commonsware.com
>> > > Android App Developer Books:http://commonsware.com/books.html
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Android Developers" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<android-developers%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Android Developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<android-developers%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to