Again, don't agree. I think the opposite is true, that is, it is a good idea. I believe most users will try to use the lite version. However, if it is of limited time then if they like your app they will buy it, else they won't care. The only ones that will complain are those that will not buy your app because they like everything free and frankly you don't need them.
As an anecdote I always use the lite version unless truely forced to buy the full version. On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:38 AM, Muthu Ramadoss <[email protected]> wrote: The preferred way is to provide a "LITE" version. If the users are happy with the lite version, they would be eager on your premium one. But putting a time bomb in the app is a bad bad idea. take care, Muthu Ramadoss. http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz +91-9840348914 http://androidrocks.in - Android Consulting. On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:29 AM, LB Coder <[email protected]> wrote: Don't know on that, but you would DEFINITELY alienate users. On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Mattaku Betsujin <[email protected]> wrote: I am earger to put my app onto the market, even for free (until paid apps are allowed). Is it allowed to put a time bomb in the app and make it useless after a trial period? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
