> I calculated and think I can remove 70% of the execution time on this > Interpretor architecture on J2ME CLDC which does not support the > dynamic class loading.
Well, that would be a "negligible" speedup when looking at a 2-3 orders of magnitude performance gap. Not worth bothering about. > So I will not speed it up. No problem. Thanks! On Apr 3, 12:50 pm, hisano <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you think that this is avoidable through a further engineered redesign > > of your Java Dalvik VM? > > I calculated and think I can remove 70% of the execution time on this > Interpretor architecture on J2ME CLDC which does not support the > dynamic class loading. > > But this implementation is intended not to use as a platform but to > study the implementation. > So I will not speed it up. > > --- > Koji Hisano > > On Apr 3, 6:45 pm, blindfold <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thank you, Koji, these are interesting figures. Apparently the Java > > interpreter for Dalvik bytecodes adds two to three orders of magnitude > > computational overhead. Do you think that this is avoidable through a > > further engineered redesign of your Java Dalvik VM? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
