Ok, i see, but im my situation, that's not enough. (think in industrial
environments such as meat factories or heavy duty warehouses, frozen
warehouses, etc, etc.)

Thanks.

2009/5/8 Mark <[email protected]>

>
>
>   That is an interesting question, one that I am interested in also.
> I write software that runs on Palm devices, that is designed to be
> used in outdoor environments see http://snowpilot.org  . I don't know
> of anyone right now that has an outdoor specific Android device in the
> works, but I think there will be a proliferation of new Android
> devices, some of these might good for outdoor use, Nokia just came out
> with a new device the Nokia N810 , that may have some potential for
> outdoor use, at least it has an LED screen that is designed to be used
> outdoors, and its relatively cheap, being as how it is a netbook, not
> a phone. I'm hoping that due to the open nature of Android, that we
> will see a greater variety devices than with other OS's. My current
> Android device is a G1, it's not specifically rugged-dized, but it
> seems quite durable.
>
> Some advantages that Android / G1 currently platforms:
>
> - It can be completely powered down, and uses almost no power when in
> sleep state. (not the case with I-phone or some WM devices like I-paq)
> - It has a removable battery, replacemement batteries are cheap,
> light, and easy to change out in the field.
> - The G1 is relatively shock proof, I drop mine all the time it seems,
> still works fine.
> - The G1 is somewhat moisture resistant, some one claims to have run
> there's through the washing machine, and it partially works.
>
> Also with the Palm devices we have used some relatively simple ideas
> to ruggedize off the shelf devices, such as having a slip over rubber
> cover to shock proof, and using a plastic wrapper for wet conditions.
> In the future I'm hoping to see what would be the ultimate outddor PDA
> based on Android, such a device would run Android, and have a
> capacitive touch screen Mirasol display. The technlology to do this is
> just now hitting the market, so maybe we'll see such a device in the
> next year or two. Anyhow I plan use some Android devices in the
> backcountry this summer, so we'll see how they fare under field use.
> I'd like to port our Palm app to Android (or another modern mobile OS)
> at some point, but I'm waiting to see how many users are willing to
> adopt Android to replace their older devices. I do know that most of
> the major mobile OEM's are planning on coming out with Android devices
> within the next year, so that is encouraging.
>
>               Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 8, 4:45 am, Hoze <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > This is my first message in this forum, and I'm not totally sure if
> > this is the right place to post this question, so excuse me in
> > advance.
> >
> > I am part of an ISV and we are planning to redesign all our mobile
> > applications during Q4 of 2009 and Q1 of 2010.
> > But I have doubts about one very important question (not talking about
> > reliability or any kind of issue about android). I have read a lot of
> > blogs, forums, etc, and i have still not found an easy answer to this:
> >
> > Is there a plan to deploy Android to the enterprise market via
> > rugeddized terminals (like the ones of psion or datalogic, for
> > example)? when can we have one robust terminal working with Android?
> >
> > Today all the industrial terminals are working with WM and WCE, and
> > due that our market is towards this sector, we are afraid to begin
> > working with Android and after we'll have a working solutions and
> > couldn't find any terminal to use with.
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to