The "you can't use android in a name without our permissions" claim is crude 
attempt to control its' use that has no legal backing in most of the world.

Google don't own the trademark to the word Android in many parts of the world 
and therefore have no real way of backing their claim that you need their 
permission to use it. In the EU specifically they're recently re-applied to try 
and register the trademark using a much narrower definition that limits their 
control of it to mobile 'phones and smart 'phones because it looks like the 
original application was rejected and they tried to appeal the decision (use 
http://oami.europa.eu/CTMOnline/RequestManager/en_SearchBasic and search for 
trade mark no 6410856 for the first attempt and 8458309 for the most recent 
one).

As for Android being Google maintained, well, they've always claimed it's an 
open project, and OEMs are free to make changes to Android without Googles 
agreement, so I'm not too stable that claim is. For example; look at the Zii 
Egg; It's offered with Android, but lacks many of the buttons you see on an 
Android 'phone and probably has numerous customisations to deal with the 
platform it's running on, all of which could have been made without Googles 
approval or involvement.

I think a better description would be "Google approved", but hey, you are, of 
course, free to say what you want.

Al.

--

* Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ *

======
Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.

The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
subsidiaries.

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Maan Najjar
Sent: 08 August 2009 22:30
To: [email protected]
Subject: [android-discuss] Re: Federated app directories

Thanks for the response, you have some good points. I hope you find success in 
delivering your application to end users.
Google is maintaining android operating system and I think "official" is the 
right term to describe their "Android Market" application. That's why you are 
not allowed to use Android word in your application name without their 
permission (See "Android in Official Names" in Brand Guidelines at "Android 
Official Website"). Therefore I think it's ok to call other alternative 
applications as unofficial or 3rd party applications.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Mark Murphy 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Maan Najjar wrote:
> I've seen more than one unofficial app store for android so far.
They're not "unofficial". They are independent.

> Forgive me asking this , but what's the purpose of those unofficial app
> stores ? Isn't Market sufficient for app distribution ?
1. Not all Android devices will have Android Market, particularly those
whose manufacturers are simply using the Android open source tree rather
than signing any sort of deal with Google to get proprietary apps like
Android Market.

2. Not all users can use Android Market. For example, owners of the ADP1
cannot obtain copy-protected apps from the Android Market.

3. Not all developers can sell via the Android Market, only those in
select locations, in part due to the dependence upon Google Checkout
(see below).

4. Android Market's only current payment option is Google Checkout,
which some consumers will not wish to use, or cannot use because they
lack the payment mechanisms (e.g., credit card) that Google Checkout
requires.

5. Android Market's terms and conditions may contain terms that
developers are unwilling to accept.

6. Android Market takes 30% off the top, plus Google Checkout fees, from
the developer's take, which some developers may prefer to avoid.

7. Some carriers and/or device manufacturers may elect to run their own
markets for control purposes, or to capture more revenue (e.g., more
than 30%), or to support other languages, or...

I am sure there are other reasons as well.

This is not to say that the Android Market is evil, but rather that
having alternatives and competition among markets is a very healthy thing.

--
Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)
http://commonsware.com | http://twitter.com/commonsguy

Android App Developer Books: http://commonsware.com/books.html




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to