This is only my opinion: I would think that a social app without real community interaction will have lower chances of winning as opposed to one that does.
On Aug 31, 2009, at 2:00 PM, omnitial <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Incognito, > thats always cool to have a lower chance rather than invalid :) thank > you :) > > but can you say why lower chance ? isn't it all about the user > experience with the app. ? > potential app is always apreciatable, isn't it ? > the main motivation of adc2 is to provide assistance to the most > potential apps choose by the end user, isn't it ? > > On Aug 31, 11:21 pm, Incognito <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is not invalid. Whomever said that lied. However, your chances of >> winning are much lower. >> >> On Aug 31, 2009, at 3:25 AM, omnitial <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> hello, >> i'm quite new in adc2 and also a late comer. >> i developed 2 app for the adc2 rushly. >> One of my app is a social app which need a server to run in real >> time. >> But i couldn't manage to acquire a server for my app, by far now (due >> to many reasons). >> So i decided to make a demo database inside my app. So if a end user >> use my app he can get all the options fully functional. >> while discussing about it with others, some one said that, my app is >> invalid for the adc2 due to this demo database. >> >> i'm really confused about it. i need suggestions now. :( >> am i heading towards right or invalid way ??? >> >> omnitial > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
