If you mean that camera preview needs to work the same way, I agree with you. This should not require any change to the application though.
On Dec 21, 3:17 am, hanchao3c <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks . > I think the Widget for Camera and VideoView may need consider more > for using HW overlay Surface. > > For Preview case , It need do more consider than MediaPlayer. Ex, Add > UI emelent on the top of privew, so the WIdget Class need take > consider the layers management and color key. > > Just like we discussed before. > > On 12月19日, 上午12时39分, Dave Sparks <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't see the benefit of integrating them together. It would just > > add one more layer over the Camera interface. > > > We will probably write a widget similar to VideoView to make image and > > motion capture easier for app developer. > > > On Dec 18, 4:50 am, hanchao3c <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > oh............................ > > > I find it in cupcake branch, > > > Add this files in frameworks/base/ include / media / > > > IMediaRecorder.h > > > PVMediaRecorder.h > > > > According to the interface : > > > mediarecorder = audio recoder + video recoder + preview. > > > > And the still image capture interface in base/ include / ui / > > > Camera.h > > > This Camera (Jpeg) = Jpeg capture + preview. > > > > At least the preview part (viewfinder ) of them are same. Both using > > > Suface as interface. > > > > Do we have plan integrate them together ?- 隐藏被引用文字 - > > > - 显示引用的文字 - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "android-framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-framework?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
