audioflinger and surface flinger should not be impacted. basically, to
rewrite the code in opencore/android is enough. that's something like
gstreamer/android or xxxx/android...

On Feb 22, 11:53 am, Freepine <[email protected]> wrote:
> I guess the entire media framework includes not only opencore, but also
> media api, audio flinger and perhaps part of surface flinger:)
> If you just want to replace opencore, I think you can look at the code of
> PVPlayer, PVMediaRecorder and PVMetadataRetriever and replace them with your
> own implementations.
>
> http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=tree;...
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:37 AM, jerand <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > yes .. thats exactly my point .. if there are well defined interfaces;
> > then third party applications should work as such if the same
> > interface is used.
> > please comment.
>
> > On Feb 22, 5:11 am, Paranoia <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > is it impossible to use the same media api? i mean the app developer
> > > does not need to care which media engine s/he is using. replace
> > > opencore with gstreamer, or something else.
>
> > > On Feb 22, 1:21 am, Dave Sparks <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I don't think you want to replace the entire media framework. If you
> > > > do, it's highly unlikely that 3rd party apps are going to work with
> > > > your framework.
>
> > > > On Feb 21, 9:05 am,jerand<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > i want to replace the entire media framework with my own framework to
> > > > > process media data ..
> > > > > is that feasible ? how tightly is open core coupled with the
> > > > > platform ?
>
> > > > > On Feb 20, 10:06 pm, rktb <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Please help me understand ... are you trying to replace "opencore"
> > of
> > > > > > "mediaplayer" ?
>
> > > > > > -Ravi
>
> > > > > > On Feb 20, 11:02 am, Paranoia <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > just read the code. it's not too difficult.
> > > > > > > but you have to replace the whole mediaserver, if you want to
> > replace
> > > > > > > the opencore
>
> > > > > > > On Feb 21, 12:01 am, scs sek <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > This can be partially reused for the application, Is there any
> > > > > > > > document for platform interface?
> > > > > > > > On 2/20/09, Dave Sparks <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > There is a well-defined interface for new media players.
> > There are
> > > > > > > > > already 3 players in Android: OpenCore, Vorbis, and MIDI.
> > They each
> > > > > > > > > implement MediaPlayerInterface.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Feb 19, 11:26 pm,jerand<[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> are there any well-defined interfaces on how the android's
> > app
> > > > > > > > >> framework and open core interact? if so, is there any
> > document for the
> > > > > > > > >> same.Like
> > > > > > > > >> Androids app framework ||| media interface ||| some media
> > framework
> > > > > > > > >> ||| platform interface ||| platform
>
> > > > > > > > >> or should new wrappers be written to map to player app of
> > the
> > > > > > > > >> application framework layer if am going to use the already
> > added apps
> > > > > > > > >> like player or recorder ?
>
> > > > > > > > >> one more approach could be to develop a new player app which
> > uses the
> > > > > > > > >> new framework, pack it and add to the app framework.
>
> > > > > > > > >> Basically I would like to know of the standard media
> > interfaces for
> > > > > > > > >> native android applications like player/ recorded !!!- Hide
> > quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"android-framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-framework?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to