Its a WMAdecoder



________________________________
From: Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com>
To: android-framework@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, 15 July, 2009 10:29:09 PM
Subject: Re: Registration of a decoder with the open MAX


What other codec are you trying?

JBQ

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:15 AM, sesha giri<sesha_giri_n...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> I am not trying mp3 I am just giving you an example.
> I am trying some other codec.
> But I am not sure about this function call in two files
> So I wanted to know which one should I use.
> What is the effect if I dont call at one of the places.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com>
> To: android-framework@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 July, 2009 7:45:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Registration of a decoder with the open MAX
>
>
> There's already an mp3 decoder in the system, there's no point
> contributing another one, it's unlikely to be accepted (unless you can
> justify major improvements over the existing one).
>
> This list is for people contributing to the Android Open-Source
> Project. If you're just using the code without planning to contribute,
> android-porting is a much better list.
>
> JBQ
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:19 AM, sesha giri<sesha_giri_n...@yahoo.co.in>
> wrote:
>> You can take any decoder.
>> In both the files its the same function being called.
>> The two files are(I am using cupcake version) :
>> 1: pv_omxregistry.cpp
>> 2: pv_omxcore.cpp
>>
>> The function are something like Mp3Register()
>>
>> Can you please check the files and tell me the reason.
>>
>> --Giri
>> ________________________________
>> From: Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com>
>> To: android-framework@googlegroups.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, 15 July, 2009 6:15:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: Registration of a decoder with the open MAX
>>
>>
>> Which decoder are you talking about? With all the questions going on
>> in that area, are you sure you're not duplicating someone else's work?
>>
>> JBQ
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:52 AM, sesha giri<sesha_giri_n...@yahoo.co.in>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I have been integrating a new decoder with the open max of android
>>> cupcake
>>> version.
>>> To integrate a new decoder the decoder does the registration this
>>> registration is done in two palces
>>> 1: pv_omxregistry.cpp
>>> 2: pv_omxcore.cpp
>>>
>>> So what is the difference in the both.
>>> If they both do the same thing why is that it is done twice.
>>>
>>>
>>> --Giri
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out
>>> Yahoo!
>>> Buzz.
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
>> Android Engineer, Google.
>>
>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> warning.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out
>> Yahoo!
>> Buzz.
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> Android Engineer, Google.
>
> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> warning.
>
> ________________________________
> See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo!
> Buzz.
> >
>



-- 
Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
Android Engineer, Google.

Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
warning.



      Looking for local information? Find it on Yahoo! Local 
http://in.local.yahoo.com/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"android-framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-framework@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
android-framework+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-framework?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to