Anil,
I currently have Mistral OMAP35x EVM (running OMAP3503) and am trying
to port android 0.9 to run on it.  However, EVM SDK from Mistral/TI is
based on 2.6.22.18 and android 0.9 is based on 2.6.25.  Mainly, I've
been having difficulty applying OMAP35x EVM patch (I created from diff
between linux-2.6.22.18 and kernel running on OMAP35x EVM =
linux-2.6.22.18+TI mods) to plain linux-2.6.25.  Since it looks like
you gotten things running on OMAP3430, do you have suggestions or
guidance?  Thought I should get 2.6.25 going on the EVM, then try
applying android patch (I created from diff between linux-2.6.25 and
linux-2.6.25-android-0.9_r1).

Any help would be appreciated.
twebb


On Sep 4, 6:16 am, "Anil Sasidharan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Ram,
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Anil,
>
> >  I able to bring android m5 kernel with m3 file system on omap2430sdp
> > with linux kernel 2.6.26.
>
> Any specific reason for this combo? (m3 FS on m5 kernel?)
>
> > <http://2.6.26.>
>
> > 1. i am unable to bring-up m5 file system. my android patch from
> > raymond contains driver/android, driver/binder tree structure.. does
> > it have any issues? do i need to bring binder.c into driver/android?
>
> /driver/binder is obsolete, instead use the driver module in driver/android.
> This would appear as one of the "misc" devices.
>
>
>
> > 2. does it related with frame buffer driver?  i haven't modified
> > existing frame buffer driver..
>
> M5 will not come up without the framebuffer driver supporting double
> bufffering
>
>
>
> > 3. now currently i am working on omap3430sdp with kernel 2.6.22 from
> > TI.  where u got the kernl 2.6.24 for omap3430 sdp.
> >   if i edit raymond patch for omap3430 , will it be OK? pls share
> > yiur experience on this?
>
> I've not tried bringing up Android on OMAP3430-SDP, hence no comments on
> that part. However our effort on Mistral's OMAP3EVM (based on 3430) was
> successful. You need to turn off the TLS register support while building the
> kernel for OMAP3430 platform to support Android as it does not have support
> for TLS register up-till Android V09 SDK. (BTW, we have Android v09 up and
> running)
>
>
>
> > Thanks in advance
> > -Rammohan
>
> Warm Regards,
> Anil
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 13, 10:42 pm, "Anil Sasidharan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Anil,
>
> > > >  please answer following two basic questions:
>
> > > > 1. does android application starts automatically after kernel calling
> > > > init module? OR  do we need to run specific android application/
> > > > scripts?
>
> > > You will have to setup certain environment variables before invoking
> > "init".
> > > Please refer towww.elinux.org/Android_OMAPformore details
>
> > > > 2. now i have decided to work with kernel 2.6.23/22. but these kernel
> > > > versions doesn't have Omap2430 sdp support.  can you please tell me
> > > > where i can get the kernel 2.6.22/2.6.23 with omap2430 sdp compliant
> > > > OR  you have done this exercise for yourself.  please let me know any
> > > > links available on this.
>
> > > As I'd pointed out before, I was never successful in bringing up Android
> > on
> > > OMAP2430SDP and the hardware platform on which Android came up was
> > Mistral's
> > > OMAP2 EVM. However I guess you should be able to get the 2.6.23/2.6.22
> > > kernel from the omap GIT.
>
> > > > Thanks in advance..
>
> > > > -RamMohan
>
> > > > On Aug 11, 4:17 am, "Anil Sasidharan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > >      I'm CC-ing this to the group as well as it may help someone else
> > > > also
> > > > > :-)
>
> > > > >      Please see my answers in-lined with your post
>
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 1:28 AM, roy basavaraju <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > *Anil,*
> > > > > > **
> > > > > > *  i got patch from raymond. but when i tried to patch it with my
> > > > working
> > > > > > kernel 2.6.26(which is omap2430 sdp compliant), it had undergone
> > some
> > > > patch
> > > > > > errors & mainly it hasn't found omap24xxfb.c file to patch. i got
> > this
> > > > file
> > > > > > from TI site & now i want to patch with this file.*
>
> > > > > I've never tried applying the kernel patch that I've received from
> > > > Raymond
> > > > > onto 2.6.26 kernel. My experminets with Android on both OMAP2430 and
> > > > > OMAP3430 platforms were done with the following kernel versions:
> > > > > (a) 2.6.22 -> OMAP2430 (b) 2.6.23 -> OMAP2430 (c) 2.6.24 -> OMAP3430
>
> > > > > Therefore I may not be able to comment on the feasibility of applying
> > > > those
> > > > > patches on top of 2.6.26 kernel (there might be a lot of API
> > changes).
> > > > The
> > > > > 2.6.24 kernel being supported by TI on Labrador board (OMAP3430
> > platform)
> > > > > does have the difference that you have pointed out. I guess from
> > 2.6.24
> > > > > onwards the "omap24xxfb.c" replaced with omap_fb.c for OMAP3430
> > platforms
> > > > > and omapfb_main.c for OMAP2430 platforms.
>
> > > > > **
>
> > > > > > **
> > > > > > *do i need to mount  procfs or just my kernel(2.6.26+omap2430sdp)
> > with
> > > > > > raymond patch + m5 sdk will bring android default apps onto
> > > > omap2430sdp.
> > > > > > please clarify do i need to do any kind of modification in m5-sdk.*
>
> > > > > Yes you have to supprt procfs, tmpfs and sysfs and these need to be
> > > > mounted
> > > > > before your invoke Android.
>
> > > > > > **
> > > > > > **
> > > > > > *Thanks a lot anil...*
> > > > > > **
> > > > > > *-RamMohan*
>
> > > > > Warm Regards,
> > > > > Anil- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Internals" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-internals?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to