On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 11:04 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Chih-Wei <cwhu...@linux.org.tw> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I have tried to submit two patches (9749, 9782) to 2.6.27 branch.
> 
> Do you have direct links to these patches?
> 
> > One is an enhancement (adding a driver) and the other is a bug fix for
> > a kernel exception.
> > These patches are just back-ported from 2.6.29, so it should be safe
> > to apply them.
> > However, one is rejected and the other is just ignored.
> > The rejected reason is "we are no longer accepting patches for the
> > 2.6.27 tree".
> >
> > I don't like such a reason. If 2.6.27 is an obsolete branch, it is
> > fair to reject by this reason.
> > But 2.6.27 is still the master branch (correct if I'm wrong),
> > I can't see any rationality to reject or ignore an enhancement or a
> > bugfix.
> 
> Why would you need these patches accepted into the .27 tree?  For new
> android devices, aren't you using .29 already?  Why would you want to
> use .27 instead?
> 
> confused as to why exactly you need these patches in the tree,
> 
No, Android is not using .29 yet. The CUPCAKE is still using .27. As
matter fact for x86 platforms, the .29 does not work yet.
Yi
> greg k-h
> 
> > 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
unsubscribe: android-kernel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-kernel
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to