On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Porting beginner <
porting.begin...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:00 AM, AchimNohl <achim.n...@coware.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have see the same symptom while brining up 2.0 on an ARM926EJS based
>> (virtual) platform. 1.5 was working fine and my kernel remained
>> unchanged. In my analysis tools, I see that in my case the boot gets
>> stuck in  a pthread_mutex_lock. After that the CPU is just idle. The
>> lock is called from hardware/libhardware/modules/gralloc.cpp in
>> init_pmem_area. I do not know if the problem is the same as yours but
>> I will update you once I found out more.
>>
>>
> Thanks for details , me too got stuck at same place, so it looks many guys
> have same problem. It shouldn't be fb driver issue or might need some
> changes in fb driver to make it work but we don't know what.
>
>
Is there any official details what changes/new feature required from kernel
when migrating to eclair from donut ? Or differences between eclair and
donut in term of low level drivers and functionality ?


> Anyone has successfully migrate (bring-up) to eclair with same kernel from
> donut ?
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Achim
>>
>> On Nov 20, 4:52 am, Porting beginner <porting.begin...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Alexey Roslyakov <
>> >
>> > alexey.roslya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Can you share your diff and/or logcat output?
>> >
>> > I/SurfaceFlinger(  784): SurfaceFlinger is starting
>> > I/SurfaceFlinger(  784): SurfaceFlinger's main thread ready to run.
>> > Initializing graphics H/W...
>> > E/FramebufferNativeWindow(  784):  +++++++++++ CALLING framebuffer_open
>> > ++++++
>> > W/gralloc (  784):  -----------  here in framebuffer, doing ioctl for
>> page
>> > flippping ------
>> > W/gralloc (  784):  ----------- here in framebuffer, doing ioctl for
>> page
>> > flippping -------
>> > W/gralloc (  784):  ----------- here in framebuffer, doing ioctl for
>> page
>> > flippping --------
>> > I/gralloc (  784): ++++++++++++using (fd=23)
>> > I/gralloc (  784): id           = LCDfb
>> > I/gralloc (  784): xres         = 240 px
>> > I/gralloc (  784): yres         = 320 px
>> > I/gralloc (  784): xres_virtual = 240 px
>> > I/gralloc (  784): yres_virtual = 640 px
>> > I/gralloc (  784): bpp          = 16
>> > I/gralloc (  784): r            = 11:5
>> > I/gralloc (  784): g            =  5:6
>> > I/gralloc (  784): b            =  0:5
>> > I/gralloc (  784): width        = 240 mm (25.400000 dpi)
>> > I/gralloc (  784): height       = 320 mm (25.400000 dpi)
>> > I/gralloc (  784): refresh rate = 60.00 Hz
>> > E/FramebufferNativeWindow(  784):  +++++++++++ CALLING gralloc_open
>> ++++++
>> > E/FramebufferNativeWindow(  784):  +++++++++++ INITIALIZE THE BUFFER
>> FIFO
>> > +++++
>> > E/FramebufferNativeWindow(  784):  +++++++++++ AFTER GRDEV->ALLOC O
>> +++++
>> > E/FramebufferNativeWindow(  784): xDpi -2097152000
>> > E/FramebufferNativeWindow(  784): yDpi -2097152000
>> >
>> > On Nov 20, 12:22 am, Michael Trimarchi <trimar...@gandalf.sssup.it>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > Hi,
>> >
>> > > > Alexey Roslyakov wrote:
>> > > > > I added LOGI just before return from fb_device_open.
>> >
>> > > > > I/gralloc (  713): fb_device_open res: 0
>> >
>> > > > > fb device initialized successfully. Problem is not here.
>> > > > > But where?
>> >
>> > > > maybe we have the same architecture. I'm compiling eclair for
>> openmoko
>> > > but
>> > > > the issue that I have is a crash in opencore. I'm trying to find the
>> > > > related problem,
>> > > > can you share with us your configuration for compile on the armv4t
>> > > > architecture?
>> >
>> > > > Michael
>> >
>> > > --
>> > > unsubscribe: 
>> > > android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<android-porting%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> <android-porting%2bunsubscr...@­googlegroups.com>
>> > > website:http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks
>> > Rizavan- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> --
>> unsubscribe: 
>> android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<android-porting%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
>
>


-- 
Thanks

-- 
unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting

Reply via email to