On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Chris Palmer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:33 AM, nlsp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This boils down to whether it is okay to prioritize availability over > > security. > > Availability is a security guarantee just like confidentiality or > integrity. > > > Still, the actual question remains: does the android browser > > support CRL or OCSP in any form? > > Even desktop Firefox has security.OCSP.require set to false. Read the > Imperial Violet post again carefully. > > > And since CRLs can be cached, it would be perfectly sane to have a > > cached CRL on device for an intermediate that has been compromised, > > They get kind of big. > This can be addressed, and there's already some work up on imperialviolet about it: http://www.imperialviolet.org/2011/04/29/filters.html Geremy Condra -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Security Discussions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-security-discuss?hl=en.
