Does anyone know if a) on the David's list below would be problematic for non self-signed certs?
On Jan 18, 11:57 am, David Herges <[email protected]> wrote: > > self-signed cert is not a "hard" > > requirement, but rather a questionable practice and in this regard, > > I'm curious if I'll have any problems with publishing apps on Android > > market when use non self-signed certs, but the ones signed by an > > approved CA? > > These are two separate problems: > a) publishing two Android market > b) installing apk on device > > For b), from what I know, the only requirement is that the application is > signed with (any kind of) x509 certificate. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Security Discussions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-security-discuss?hl=en.
