lol, I think that was supposed to apply to http://developer.android.com/reference/java/lang/SecurityManager.html
"Legacy security code; do not use. Security managers do not provide a secure environment for executing untrusted code. Untrusted code cannot be safely isolated within the Dalvik VM." since it was from this change Author: Elliott Hughes <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jan 6 18:13:31 2011 -0800 Retire SecurityManager. This change removes all the code that was calling getSecurityManager, and removes all use of AccessController.doPrivileged. It also changes the implementation of AccessController so it doesn't actually do anything; it's only there for source-level compatibility. Bug: 2585285 Change-Id: I1f0295a4f12bce0316d8073011d8593fee116f71 -bri On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> wrote: > http://developer.android.com/reference/java/security/package-summary.html > > As of 2012-10-07 the page begins with: > > "package java.security > This package is for compatibility with legacy code only, and should not be > used or expected to do anything useful." > > > Where is the recommended API that one can expect does something useful? > > Anders > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Android Security Discussions" group. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-security-discuss?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Security Discussions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-security-discuss?hl=en.
