Matthias, > the quote below looks like it quotes one of my emails but in fact it > quotes one of yours. ??
Actually, I did quote your email: the sentence beginning with "basically." I included my original post, too, only for clarity. I'm sorry that it caused confusion instead. :) [I think you may have miscounted (if there is such a word) the number of brackets. Now, in the quote below, there is my original paragraph with 4 brackets, your reply with 3, my reply (including only the "quoting Matthias"-kind-of text) with 2 and finally your second reply with 1. If you substract 2 brackets, you get the part of my mail, quoting yours and mine.] > > * Matthias Bohlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-29 21:46]: > > > > For model-to-model transformations, I figure AndroMDA will > > > > need a mapping to each implementation language. If so, I'd > > > > like to extend the Java cartridge with a generic > > > > class/interface template and a transformer class with the > > > > helper methods this requires. > > > basically, this would be OK but I need a little more understanding > > > which helper methods this would require. > About model-to-model transformations: I don't think that model > transformations are so good that we should do almost everything with it. In short: I agree. Templates are easier to customize-a-bit, and if someone wants to make bigger changes, they always have the option of writing Helpers in Java. Maybe the real place for the kind of model-to-model transformations I thought you'd meant is the UML modelling tool. -- Attila ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Andromda-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel
