RE: [Andromda-user] Stereotypes Different In Documentation

[Matthias Bohlen]

Title: Nachricht

Hi Matthew,   you are right - there are some documentation bugs on the website.   The web page text (http://www.andromda.org/pages/modeling.html) describes the correct stereotypes, the car rental sample contains them, the cartridges understand them. HOWEVER, the figures on the website are WRONG, they still use the old EJB stereotypes which have been removed from the generator.   So, please use the stereotypes described in the text, not in the UML diagrams on the website.   Cheers... Matthias -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Pomar Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Andromda-user] Stereotypes Different In Documentation I've noticed that some of the steroetypes the AndroMDA say to use are different than the car rental example. For example, AndroMDA doesn't seem to understand <<Entity>> but does recognize <<EntityBean>>, where the formal is the stereotype in the AndroMDA documentation, and the later is the strereotype in the example. This is not the only one either. There is also ejbref and <<StatelessSessionBean>>.   Could someone tell me where I can find a definitive list of stereotypes and thier purpose for use in AndroMDA?   Thanks Again, Matthew Pomar