true On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 14:38, Wouter Zoons wrote: > That was my initial idea too, but the 'Date' is already implied by the type, > isn't it > > Suppose you want a SimpleDateFormatter then you can always call it > myVariableSimpleFormatter > > See what I mean ? > > -- Wouter > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 12:51 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: 'Andromda User' > > Subject: RE: [Andromda-user] First letter changed to # in @see's > > > > On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 10:51, Wouter Zoons wrote: > > > > So in fact, the way I see it it inserts '#ate' > > > > > > [WZ> ] forgt what I said, the parameter itself had already 'Date' in > > it's > > > name; perhaps I should renamed the 'DateFormatter' suffix to > > 'Formatter', > > > what do you think ? > > > > > > -- Wouter > > > > Well their maybe other formatters so I would keep the Date in the > > formatter name. > > > > -- > > Martin West > > Head of Product Design and Development > > http://www.star-map.net > > +44(0)207 318 0308 > > +44(0)787 968 0096 -- Martin West Head of Product Design and Development http://www.star-map.net +44(0)207 318 0308 +44(0)787 968 0096
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
