Hi Wouter,
first of all - thank you very much for time! So you think we should map ActivityGraphFacade to ActivityGraph and StateMachine? >From the technical view it's ok for me. I would then write my own >StateMachineFacade which has a generalization to ActivityGraphFacade. I would >do this because I do not want to use for example methods like >getActionStates() from a StateMachine (there should be getStates()...). That`s why I think it would be clearer to write a StateMachineFacade. But you are the one who implements this feature ;-). So please tell me which solution I should write into the JIRA-issue. Thanks Timo -- ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles _________________________________________________________ Reply to the post : http://galaxy.andromda.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1698#1698 Posting to http://forum.andromda.org/ is preferred over posting to the mailing list! ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Andromda-user mailing list Andromda-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user
