Op 11 okt. 2011, om 04:52 heeft Cliff Brake het volgende geschreven: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> > wrote: >> >> Op 10 okt. 2011, om 18:28 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Cliff Brake <cliff.br...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> What are the tradeoffs between using openssh and dropbear? I'm using >>>> Angstrom/systemd images, and would prefer dropbear as its likely >>>> smaller, but want to make sure I understand the other tradeoffs. >>>> >>> >>> biggest win dropbear has is memory footprint both static and runtime >>> and it lacks sftp-server >> >> openssh-sftp can be installed in parallel at a very low cost. Graeme added >> that to angstrom years ago :) > > dropbear-systemd openssh-sftp is what I'm currently using. I found > the source of my confusion. For some reason, I'm having trouble with > a number of sysvinit services (including dropbear) starting in my > image. I've starting moving things like networking over to systemd > anyway. I noticed there is a dropbear@.service, but it is masked. Is > systemd + dropbear working?
It is, did you install systemd-compat-units to mask the sysvinit scripts? _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
