On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:49 PM Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch> wrote:
> Hi, > > Using the v2015.12 packages feeds -dev packages showed that there are > quite some nonexisting packages which are in the recommends list of > packages, leading to lot of messages, e.g.: > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-shape-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-dpms-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-render-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-shm-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-dri3-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-damage-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-glx-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-composite-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-res-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-xvmc-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-xkb-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-sync-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-xevie-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-dri2-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-randr-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-record-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-xprint-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-xv-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-xtest-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-screensaver-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-present-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-xf86dri-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-xinerama-dev > libxcb-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libxcb-xfixes-dev > libx11-dev: unsatisfied recommendation for libx11-xcb-dev > > So libxcb-dev, has libxcb-shape-dev in its recommendation list, but > libxcb-shape-dev does not exist at all. I guess the reason for that is > libxcb-shape is built from the recipe libxcb with some package split > magic. Any idea how to get rid of those non-existing recommendations? > > Also, it seems to be a new behavior I don't remember seen this in > 2015.06 releases. > I wonder if its due to the fact that all dev files are now bundled into single ipk. may be we are missng the RPROVIDES then ? > > -- > Stefan > > _______________________________________________ > Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list > Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel > _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
