Andrea, If I remember correctly narcissus builds OS image only. So for the kernel to work properly, you need to update the image more specifically '/lib/modules/' directory so appropriate modules are available for the kernel to load. I hope this helps.
Cheers... Andre On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:00 AM, <[email protected] > wrote: > Send Angstrom-distro-users mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-users > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Angstrom-distro-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Problems loading SGX drivers (Andrea Fazzi) > 2. Re: Problems loading SGX drivers (Koen Kooi) > 3. Re: Problems loading SGX drivers (Andrea Fazzi) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:31:05 +0100 > From: Andrea Fazzi <[email protected]> > Subject: [Angstrom-distro-users] Problems loading SGX drivers > To: angstrom-distro-users <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <1265581808-sup-9...@ganimoide> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > Hi all, > > I've got issues with SGX drivers. I built an unstable "task-base-extended" > image for a beagleboard REV C4 machine using narcissus builder checking the > "PowerVR SGX drivers for OMAP3" box. However, it seems it can't load the > modules. From dmesg: > > [ 40.819061] pvrsrvkm: no symbol version for struct_module > [ 40.975097] pvrsrvkm: no symbol version for struct_module > [ 41.002227] omaplfb: no symbol version for struct_module > > r...@beagleboard:~# uname -r > 2.6.29-omap1 > > What I'm missing? Checking "PowerVR SGX drivers for OMAP3" is it supposed > to work out-of-the-box? > > Thanks for any help! > > Cheers, > > -- > Andrea Fazzi @ alcacoop.it > Read my blog at http://freecella.blogspot.com > Follow me on http://twitter.com/remogatto > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:26:21 +0100 > From: Koen Kooi <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Angstrom-distro-users] Problems loading SGX drivers > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07-02-10 23:31, Andrea Fazzi wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I've got issues with SGX drivers. I built an unstable > "task-base-extended" > > image for a beagleboard REV C4 machine using narcissus builder checking > the > > "PowerVR SGX drivers for OMAP3" box. However, it seems it can't load the > > modules. From dmesg: > > > > [ 40.819061] pvrsrvkm: no symbol version for struct_module > > [ 40.975097] pvrsrvkm: no symbol version for struct_module > > [ 41.002227] omaplfb: no symbol version for struct_module > > > > r...@beagleboard:~# uname -r > > 2.6.29-omap1 > > > > What I'm missing? Checking "PowerVR SGX drivers for OMAP3" is it supposed > > to work out-of-the-box? > > > > Thanks for any help! > > Dude, you already got an answer to that, why are you posting new mails > to different lists instead of following up on the original one? You're > being rude and that isn't helping you getting a solution quicker. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFLb8qtMkyGM64RGpERAn2eAJ4rNYTxPwaiPjFeF7GiOTzIgENtzgCeMExe > hqXITeeNIXtYvMaYeBUq69E= > =i3GW > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:58:43 +0100 > From: Andrea Fazzi <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Angstrom-distro-users] Problems loading SGX drivers > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > 2010/2/8 Koen Kooi <[email protected]>: > > > > Dude, you already got an answer to that, why are you posting new mails > > to different lists instead of following up on the original one? You're > > being rude and that isn't helping you getting a solution quicker. > > Right, I posted the same question to different lists but I don't see > what's the problem. There are two different lists with two different > audience, I guess. One is the list of users, the other is the list of > developers. Those lists are not mutually exclusive, aren't they? I > think that posting my question to both lists can reach different > people. I don't think I'm rude for this. Moreover, I kindly asked for > help, I think. Sorry if this has bothered you in some way. > > Cheers, > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Angstrom-distro-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-users > > > End of Angstrom-distro-users Digest, Vol 41, Issue 2 > **************************************************** > _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-users
