This is a more minimal example, how id name things (no pun): http://plnkr.co/edit/qpWKOh4zSMtTGgjmWYV0?p=preview
On 1 December 2014 at 20:19, Tony pee <[email protected]> wrote: > The problem is with your understanding of how references work in > javascript i feel. In a small example: > > var obj = { prop: 123 }; an object with a property > var ref = obj.prop; > > ref = 456; // this will NOT mean that obj.prop == 456, it means that ref > is equal to a primitive value of 456. obj.prop is untouched. > > In your example, when you do lines like this: > > $scope.model.allModel = MainSvc.getModel(); > > you set on $scope.model (a different object) a reference to the object > which is ALSO stored in your model class. when you change the value of > $scope.model you just change what that reference is pointing to. The object > referenced in your service is untouched. You should try directly > referencing the value stored on the model. And you dont really want to set > it on the controller, otherwise you'd need to also update it on the service > to make it share between controllers (original purpose). So its better to > prove that it can be shared: > > http://plnkr.co/edit/Q054Lw0Mi80LRnCBKlg6?p=preview > > I changed the style to a more class like style. And kept your getters and > setters, altho they arent really needed (see the direct method works too) > > > > On 1 December 2014 at 18:05, Jonathan Price <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've got a service that has a collection of things. It also has an >> individual thing of the same type. I'll use a service like this to pass >> around between controllers when I have a collection of things that I'll >> individually want to update. Imaging a collection of say books. I can >> display the collection through a table, click on one to edit, update it and >> reload the entire collection.. >> >> I've got a plunker here that shows what I'm confused by: >> >> http://plnkr.co/edit/P2smRGGAjEIHbZyAAKKR?p=preview >> >> I don't understand why my controller's scope isn't staying directly tied >> to the service values? I thought they became associated by reference when >> I set them equal to one another in my controller? >> >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "AngularJS" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > Tony Polinelli > > -- Tony Polinelli -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
