On 24. Jun 2021, at 05:55, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > If someone creates an implementation of this document using a SID-aware, > YANG-driven code generator, then they had better use the values in the > document, not the the values derived through the yang-sid process. > (Or they'd better check!)
How would that be different if yang-cbor/sid were already published? > We expected that draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor and draft-ietf-core-sid to > have been published already, and maybe at that point, since we are stuck with > a normative reference to them, we would be able to see that IANA isn't going > to renumber of our keys on us, and we could remove this language sometime > at or before AUTH48... but… I would expect specifications to include a SID file together with the YANG spec. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
