All, apologies for the delay. Striving to have it done by the end of this
week. If I can't have it done soon and since the review seems to be urgently
needed, should we consider assigning another YD?
Regards,Reshad.
On Monday, August 9, 2021, 10:15:24 AM EDT, Mehmet Ersue <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Steffen,
AFAIK Reshad is back from vacation and will do the review in the next days.
Thank you for your patience.
Cheers,
Mehmet
From: yang-doctors <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Fries, Steffen
Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 8:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Eliot Lear <[email protected]>; Brockhaus, Hendrik
<[email protected]>; Michael Richardson <[email protected]>;
[email protected]; Werner, Thomas <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [yang-doctors] Timeline for BRSKI-AE Review
Dear Yang Doctors,
I just wanted to ask if there is any timeline information available for the
review of BRSKI-AE. We have at least two YANG questions connected to the draft,
on relates to the ongoing discussion regarding RFC8366bis to allow further
assertions to be added. This relates to issue #18
(https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-async-enroll/issues/18) in the issue
tracker of BRSKI-AE.
Besides this, there is a YANG module included in section 6 to enhance the
voucher-request with additional data to allow a registrar and MASA to verify if
an authorized registrar-agent was involved in the bootstrapping for which an
early review would be requested.
Best regards
Steffen
--
Steffen Fries
Siemens AG
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
