Hi all,
    On Wednesday, August 18, 2021, 07:46:31 AM EDT, Fries, Steffen 
<[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 Hi Michael, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
> Sent: Mittwoch, 18. August 2021 13:27
> 
>    reshad> Other comments: - rc:yang-data (RFC8040) is used. While this
>    reshad> seems to be fine, if the voucher- request-async-artifact template
>    reshad> needs to be extended in the future, my understanding is that it
>    reshad> is not possible with yang-data. However, you could use
>    reshad> "structure" and (eventually) "augment-structure" from RFC8791 for
>    reshad> this.
> 
> I am probably the guilty party that wrote the YANG.
> I guess I missed your email (seeing Steffen's reply only), and I'll go back 
> to the
> list to find it to understand.
<RR> And I didn't receive Michael's response to Steffen. Not in my Junk folder 
either.....
I saw that the constraint voucher follows the same approach.
<RR> Where is the constraint voucher defined?
> We do want to mix and match the various extensions.
> It is not clear to me how to do that.
Maybe related to this, would it be better to augment the voucher than as 
requested by Reshad or the voucher-request as we currently do it. I also had a 
look into the constraint voucher as there are also enhancements defined. So I 
guess I should go with the augmented voucher?
<RR> I didn't see a voucher-request node but I'm probably looking for the wrong 
thing.
>    > We will discuss this point. Currently there is no explicit need for
>    > enhancements.
> 
>    reshad> - Prefix "ivr" is used for ietf-voucher-request although RFC8995 
>has
>    reshad> "vcr". While this is valid, I am curious why.
> 
> I didn't think the prefix had relevance outside of the module, but I don't 
> know a
> lot here.
<RR> It doesn't. It's just usually people use the same prefix as defined in the 
module. No big deal if you want to use a different one, I was just curious why.
Regards,Reshad.
I meanwhile changed it to vcr. If it has no relevance outside the module, it 
should not be a problem

Regards
Steffen 

> 
> --
> ]              Never tell me the odds!                | ipv6 mesh networks [
> ]  Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect  [
> ]    [email protected]  http://www.sandelman.ca/       |  ruby on rails    [

  
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to