Hi ANIMA chairs, I agree with this erratum too! (disclaimer - I filed it back in 2022.) Could we please proceed with accepting this item? IANA cannot act in making the correction if we keep it in current state "Reported".
thanks Esko -----Original Message----- From: Anima <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 19:16 To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Anima] [IANA #1224432] Errors in the IANA registry contents of "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI) Parameters" Sabrina Tanamal via RT <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Michael, > This note is just to let you know that we've received the following report. Please see below. > We'll update the entries once the errata report has been verified so we > can list it as an additional reference for the registry. >> In the following registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/brski- >> parameters/brski-parameters.xhtml#pledge-brski-status-telemetry- >> attributes >> I found two errors in the registered values “Status” and “Reason”: >> these should be starting with a lowercase character, so “status” and >> “reason”. See RFC 8995, CDDL files in Section 5.7 / 5.9.4. I agree that they should be lower case and that section 8.5 is incorrect when it registers them as upper-case. >> Section 8.5 of the RFC 8995 has the wrong entries listed so I have >> just reported this as an errata to RFC 8995 (https://www.rfc- >> editor.org/errata/eid6834). Ben: I agree with this errata. Errata ID: 6834 also Errata ID: 6642 should maybe be verified. Errata ID: 6648 Errata ID: 6649 -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
