Dear Readers,

We hope you enjoy the following article by Virginia libertarian Karen 
Kwiatkowski.  Karen notes that this article hes been submitted to newspapers 
around the state, so look for her byline in your local paper.

|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|

Earth Day and 'Balance'
by Don Tabor
10 Apr 2011

EVERYONE WANTS a clean and healthy environment for their children. Probably no 
goal enjoys such universal support. So, why is the issue so contentious?

Forty-one years ago, I was the organizer for the first Earth Day Teach-In at 
Nicholls University in Thibodaux, La. We thought the world was on the brink of 
destruction in 1970, too. It was the year after the Cuyahoga River caught on 
fire. Our big issues were the population explosion and chlorinated hydrocarbon 
pesticides. For those who know only the past 20 years, it is hard to imagine 
how much progress has been made. Yet we are told the sky is still falling and 
only government can save us.

One of the difficulties for a Libertarian is resolving our distrust of 
regulations with good stewardship of our environment. Libertarians believe that 
government should act as an impartial referee, excluding force and fraud from 
the marketplace but otherwise leaving voluntary transactions between 
individuals under the control of the spontaneous order of the free market.

But when dealing with issues of the environment, markets have some blind spots. 
These are the economic paradoxes of external costs and the tragedy of the 
commons, examples of private use of force that government should prevent.

External costs are costs of a transaction that do not fall on either the buyer 
or the seller. If providing an item costs the maker $450, and it could be sold 
for $500, it would be profitable to produce. But if the pollution resulting 
from that effort damaged a neighbor's property by $100 for each item produced, 
the cost of producing that item is really $550.

However, since neither the buyer nor the seller pays that cost, the transaction 
takes place anyway. That $100 cost forced on a third party is an unresolved 
externality ideally resolved in the courts when the neighbor sued for his 
damages. The producer would then have to find ways to prevent the pollution so 
that the entire cost, both direct and external, is accounted for in the price.

But what if that damage is not to a single neighbor but to 10,000 neighbors 
downwind? Do they each sue for a penny? Obviously that isn't going to work, so 
external costs must be resolved collectively, either through regulation or 
economic means.

The other problem, the tragedy of the commons, is seen most often in the 
exploitation of domestic fish stocks, but the air and the oceans are commons, 
too. No one person, or one country, owns the oceans. But with modern methods, 
it is quite possible for the fishermen of a single country, or even a single 
commercial operation, to fish a species to near extinction. This hurts 
everyone. Further, because life exists in balance, depletion of one species 
affects others.

One would think that through enlightened self-interest, fishermen would 
restrict their harvest for long-term, sustained yield so they could continue 
their profession into the future. But there is no benefit for one fisherman, or 
the fishermen of a single corporation or country, to restrict their harvest if 
others do not. Thus, involuntary limits on harvest, by local regulation for 
lakes and rivers and by treaty for migratory fish stocks, are necessary.

So, these are areas where we must act collectively through government if the 
environment is to be protected. Unfortunately, once government becomes 
involved, all the bad things governments do will intrude in those efforts.

When quotas are used to regulate fish harvests, for example, government gains 
the power to choose winners and losers in the marketplace, leading to 
corruption and defeating the purpose of the regulations. We need only to look 
to the menhaden fishery in Virginia to see how generous campaign contributions 
by a single corporation have bought lax regulation for that industry to the 
detriment of all other users of the Chesapeake Bay and the health of the bay as 
a whole.

Once the power to regulate economic activity is granted, it will inevitably be 
misused. Falsely invoking the environment has become a common tactic. We often 
see contrived environmental concerns raised to block the development of private 
property when the true motive is no more than a desire by established residents 
to preserve a view or keep out new neighbors. Businesses use environmental 
issues to squelch potential competition or to force products or technology on 
the public no one really wants. Environmental purists seek to exclude other 
users from large tracts of public land and to limit the use of private property 
for agriculture, with exaggerated claims of endangerment of rare species. 

We must remain skeptical and vigilant lest our concern for the environment be 
abused. If we allow over-regulation to damage our economy or deny the public 
the enjoyment of our natural areas in the name of protecting them, we could 
easily incite a backlash that will undo all the progress we have made in these 
past 41 years.

|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|

Don Tabor of Chesapeake is a grandfather, Libertarian activist and proprietor 
of TidewaterLiberty.com. He is a dentist in Norfolk and Hampton.  Contact him 
at <[email protected]>.

|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|*|


Do you know of other Virginia Libertarians with recently-published material?  
Send us the link to each article, and pen a few words to introduce it to your 
fellow Libertarians!

============================================

RUN FOR OFFICE!

The Libertarian Party of Virginia is currently seeking candidates to run for 
public office for the 2011-2012 season.  Let us know:

http://Campaign.LPVA.com

============================================

-- end -- 



#############################################################
Have an announcement you'd like to post?  SCC members & many 
committee heads are all authorized to post; or you may send 
your announcements to the List Master: <[email protected]>
      <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Announcement>.
#############################################################
Unsubscribe: Send an email to [email protected] with no subject 
and "Unsubscribe Announce" as the text.
#############################################################
Libertarian Party of Virginia  http://www.LPVA.com
Phone: 703-715-6230
#############################################################
Want to see past messages?  Check the Archive:
http://www.Mail-Archive.com/[email protected]/
#############################################################

Reply via email to