Yes, That would indeed cause the opposite problem when creating groups! Didn’t really think about that, was focusing on the deletion Yes, probably adding a ‘local_only’ to both the modules makes more sense, and should keep the return correct in both cases.
Thanks, Andrea > On 18 Sep 2015, at 19:24, Brian Coca <bc...@ansible.com> wrote: > > Won't that cause the opposite problem when creating groups? Also I > believe the return is correct, it failed to delete the group as it is > not a local group and will still be present on the machine. We might > want to add a 'local_only' flag to both this and user to be more > specific on what you want as a user. > > > > -- > Brian Coca > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ansible Project" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ansible-project+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to ansible-project@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/CAJ5XC8nTg86wyDHgj_aBLLsG6aLVNufAEM0mqbmkk2BoQMt1Yw%40mail.gmail.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ansible-project+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to ansible-project@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/4674FF60-84EE-4A66-A67A-696A97EA99F6%40andreatartaglia.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
