JUnit has its own concept for handling collections for tests, namely suites. Do we want to overlap that?
-- Conor MacNeill Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.cortexebusiness.com.au -----Original Message----- From: Konstantin Nazarenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 28 June 2000 0:14 To: 'Thomas Haas'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JUnit task and friends Hi All, I am quite new in ANT/JUnit programming but I think it is a great idea to have Unit Testing framework (JUnit), which runs automatically using ANT. So I have a suggestion concerning Thomas�s realization of JUnitTask. I think it will be very helpful to derive JUnitTask from MatchingTask (not from Task). It will give us the possibility to specify what files we are going to test. For example: we have a bunch of test classes, lets say _t*.class. Using MatchingTask it is possible to perform recursive, automated ANT TEST through the entire tree of classes. Is this idea worth to work out or is it already implemented in some other way? Thanks, Konstantin. -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 4:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JUnit task and friends Upon request a snapshot of the current JUnit task is provided. Except Path.java everything resides in the optional package for now. The development got stuck due to the current discussion about the future design of ant. The JUnit task needs a proposal to replace Exec with a more extensible and reusable version offering various other feattures (see OExec.java). NOTE - This version writes the output to RUNNING-TEST-<testname>.xml. The file is renamed to TEST-<testname>.xml on success and ERROR-<testname>.xml on failure. This has been done to be compatible with our old, makefile based build system and will be obsolete, once the backends are converted to XML. - Tests are not run if a file TEST-<testname>.xml already exists. This is used for fix/build/test cycles prior to committing changes to the repository. - Both features may be made confifurable and/or optional, as they may not be needed by everybody. - I started implementing only my features, as it first looked like beside Stefan Bodewig nobody is interested in this. It looks like I was wrong, great. TODO - provide a specialiced classloader to extend the classpath at runtime differently for every junit task. - in addition to the XML output provide ASCII output. - I am not 100% happy with the XML structure, but it is fine right now. - Docu As long as it JUnit is not part of ant, I will collect patches and submit them to the list. Let me know, what you think. - tom
