>>>>> "RV" == Roger Vaughn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RV> I'm donating the source to the project - you will see that I RV> borrowed heavily from existing tasks anyway. Yes, do you think you could rewrite it to reuse existing code a little more? I'm thinking of the StreamPumper part, the cd logic and so on. Maybe ExecuteOn could be a better parent class than MatchingTask. What do you think? Stefan
