thanks :).
sorry to have miss the debate, but do we have any mailing-list archive for
reference ?
I expected "properties" should acts like variables in make or shell script,
but
only find that it can only carry one value.
Thanks ant,
Houston
Peter Donald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ntist.com> cc:
Subject: Re: Would/Can
Property's override
08/04/00 12:19 PM be configable insteads of
hardcode?
Please respond to
ant-dev
At 11:55 4/8/00 +0800, you wrote:
>Would/Can Property's override be configable insteads of hardcode?
debate about this raged on dev list a while back. I think the consensus was
that everything gets moved to interpretation time rather than parse time. I
don't know what the opinion was on overiding properties but I believe
people wanted to overide them.
It should be resolved in next release :P
Cheers,
Pete
*------------------------------------------------------*
| "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want |
| to test a man's character, give him power." |
| -Abraham Lincoln |
*------------------------------------------------------*
