>>>>> "CM" == Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CM> We almost have a mechanism in place for saying which properties CM> we want to pass to a subbuild (namely nested <property> CM> elements). Perhaps only those properties should be passed to the CM> subbuild. This is along the lines of what Jose Alberto described (I think). And my only problem with it is, that it is going to break builds - but if we all agree that this is the correct way to view it ... Let's see where the discussion leads us, maybe vote on it to make sure no "old" committers have problems with this, write it into a spec document for Ant 2.0 and implement it there. Basically this is the process I'd prefer for everything that might break older buildfiles so that we are sure, we are basing Ant 2.0 on a wide consensus that is documented. And provide a rationale for newbies at the same time. CM> What if I want to call two subbuilds and pass some properties to CM> one and not the other. Good point. Stefan
