Duncan, Whilst I am happy to have an ant revolution, I wonder whether we need it. If we all agree on a direction with regard to ant 2.0's objectives, we can move forward without a revolution. I'm not saying that we wouldn't want some revolutionary code and architecture changes and perhaps some unusual instability in ant.
If I look at the revolution in Tomcat, I can see that it is still a source of much tension in the tomcat-dev list. A revolution provides an opportunity to split the community. We should only have that if it is really necessary. If we have a revolution and everyone moves over to work on it, then why have a revolution :-) ? If we have disagreement then yes, a revolution may be required. Perhaps we should wait to see whether these is such disagreement. From the list you posted, I feel there will be broad agreement. What do you think? Conor -- Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cortex eBusiness http://www.cortexebusiness.com.au
