--- Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Duncan, > > Whilst I am happy to have an ant revolution, I > wonder whether we need it. If > we all agree on a direction with regard to ant 2.0's > objectives, we can move > forward without a revolution.
I really agree with Conor here. It would divide the community, or leave a fork of Ant stranded in limbo. If everyone is for a redesign/refactoring, or just trying out new approaches, then let's baseline a stable version for the users, and then go for it. I can see a good argument for doing it in a different directory structure so we start off fresh, but then they could be swapped out once there is an alpha version available. sim __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays! http://calendar.yahoo.com/
