Pete, I think all such ant-related properties should start with "ant."
so in this case ant.project.name rather than project.name Probably basedir should become ant.project.basedir but that would break a lot. Conor -- Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cortex eBusiness http://www.cortexebusiness.com.au > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 27 November 2000 14:34 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: accessing Ant project name > > > Hi, > > At 08:21 26/11/00 -0600, you wrote: > >Not right now. But we can easily add such a property with the following > >patch, which makes the ${project.name} property behave like the > >${basedir} property: > > > >Index: Project.java > >=================================================================== > >RCS file: > >/home/cvspublic/jakarta-ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java,v > >retrieving revision 1.45 > >diff -c -r1.45 Project.java > >*** Project.java 2000/11/25 02:38:34 1.45 > >--- Project.java 2000/11/27 00:55:32 > >*************** > >*** 286,291 **** > >--- 286,292 ---- > > > > public void setName(String name) { > > this.name = name; > >+ setProperty("project.name", name); > > I just changed this to setUserProperty so that the project name > is not able > to be overidden easily. > > Cheers, > > Pete > > *-----------------------------------------------------* > | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | > | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | > | everyone gets busy on the proof." | > | - John Kenneth Galbraith | > *-----------------------------------------------------* > >
