Actually, since it was in conjunction with having nested tasks, when I saw ISupportTasks(), I just assumed it meant simply that: I support tasks.
Made sense to me :) Diane --- Thomas Christen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The use of the prefix "I" for interfaces is not idiomatic to Java > > (according to JLS) (rather one should use the suffix Impl for > > implementation if needed to separate them both). > I or not I seams to be the question? Before reading the book "java 2 > performance and idiom guide" writen by Craig Larman and Rhett Guthrie, I > thoght the same way as you do. They say : "Many developers are moving to > the > I-convention because it instantly communicates the fact that the code > construct is an interface. This is important because interfaces are the > prefered way of specifying APIs and abstractions. Because of this, we > recommend beginning intrafce names with I.". I don't argue about this > idiom > but since we began using it, even in large Java-projects, the conceptual > model becam clearer and readable. > > > I don't see it anywhere else in the code for Ant so I guess it's > > not project-standard for Ant either. (As with most Java-projects.) > No problem, was used to the I-convention. We can stick to the standard - > if > exists at all. > > Thomas > ===== ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/
