At 09:50 27/11/00 -0500, you wrote: >Jon Stevens wrote. >> >> I'm tired of arguing about this issue. For now the summary is >> that .jar's in CVS are a good thing. Once someone decides to >> implement JPAN, I will remove the .jar's. > >I too am tired. For example, I know from past experience that as a >committer if I were to -1 this, my objection would be ignored.
Nope it wouldn't - at least not by me ;) Only one person has expressed a -1 so far (Connor IIRC) and >>From 1988 to 1998 I worked on proprietary configuration management systems >for IBM. My experience with open source is not limited to Java projects - >it includes C/C++ projects which require even more discipline. > >But for now Jon, you win. Enjoy. It's not about winning or loosing - it is about what is best for the project. I have offered a solution that would solve your objections - what do you think about it? Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
