On 12/6/00 1:48 AM, "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Search in your mail backlog for Jon's CJAN proposal, Subject was
> "[PROPOSAL] jar distribution system" 8-).
Oh, I'm +1 for a CJAN. In fact, Pier and I talked for a couple of hours one
day about how to make it work well.
But until CJAN is implemented, we need a workaround solution (iow, a hack)
that we can use now, not later. At least it would be nice. Of course, I
don't mind having the bootstrapper go off and suck in the xml classes -- it
works quite well really. :)
--
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
