On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Mariusz Nowostawski wrote:
> But should those "interfaces" being kept in ANT core, or should they be
> kept in seperate, optional tasks repository? For javac, it should be kept
[del]
> I prefer a central repository and "unification factory" for optional
> tasks, which could take care of defining those "interfaces", and which
> could keep track of all the optional tasks. The only exception would be
> javac being part of the core.
I think you will find that most people would say that "javac" is not
part of core.
The way core has been described, IIRC,
Project,
Task,
Target,
Property.
Barrie
--
Barrie Treloar
____________________________________________________________________
Barrie Treloar Phone: +61 8 8303 3300
Senior Analyst/Programmer Fax: +61 8 8303 4403
Electronic Commerce Division Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Camtech (SA) Pty Ltd http://www.camtech.com.au
--- Level 8, 10 Pulteney Street, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia. ---
____________________________________________________________________
