At 08:51 13/12/00 +0100, Stefan Bodewig wrote: ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Deprecated <prefixedfileset> element of war in favour of >> normal <fileset> element in zip > >I don't like this. This means we have a <fileset> in <copy>, <move> >and many other tasks that does not support the prefix attribute and a ><fileset> in <zip>, <jar> and <war> that does. > >I.e. we have a fileset element in Ant buildfiles with two different >attribute lists depending on context. This is not only giving us a >headache when we want to provide a DTD, this will also confuse the >user (is this a fileset that supports prefix or is it one that >doesn't).
okay - can change it - back to prefixfileset ? Thou I asked if any one didn't like this a few days ago and no one said anything ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
