James Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think all of your objections are easily handled by the use of a > base class. For example, take a look at the ACSTreeNodeElement in > Antidote.
Sure. The base class would hide the part of the interface tasks don't need, but it'd still be there and I can't see for what benefit. > BTW, getAttributes() is exactly what is missing to support the > integration of Ant into a GUI environment! Don't think so. I think task should have getters for the attributes as well - this way you can simply get the attributes via reflection using Java Beans methods, much better suited IMHO. Stefan
