on 12/27/2000 1:25 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Stevens wrote: >> >> -1. Ant is a build tool, not a tinderbox tool. I think we >> should keep them separate. > > I, too, think that they are separate, but what I am building is much more > than a tinderbox tool. Specify the specific versions of the various > projects you want in your workspace, and your configuration will be made to > your precise specifications. You are also left with two batch files / > shell scripts that can be used to update and build any or all of the > projects at any time. Syntax: > > update ( all | project... ) > > build ( all | project [target...] ) > > In short, I plan to use it they way I used to use the various > build.bat/build.sh scripts that are associated with the various projects. Great! >> Therefore, I think you should make a name for your tinderbox >> tool (if there isn't one already) and propose it to the PMC >> as a new Jakarta project. I would be very +1 on that. > > I don't know if this is relevant, but there isn't any Java content in the > project itself at the moment. I've also avoided an product specific XSL > extensions. This being said, this code was designed to target Jakarta and > related projects. I don't think that it doesn't have Java code in it is relevant because it is targeted at Java Projects right now. Lets let the PMC decide. -jon -- Honk if you love peace and quiet.
