At 11:34 9/1/01 -0500, Jason Rosenberg wrote: >I've looked at it, and tinkered with it, and there is nothing elegant >or intuitive about it. This not like any other artificial language. > >Seriously folks, there has to be a point where the purists >get real and stop arguing about the future of Ant on the basis >of mis-directed principal.
So far your the only one who believes it is misguided. You are also the most ignorant and have the least experience with Ant and other build processes - is this telling you something ? ;) If you want to add procedural elements feel free to. I doubt you will get CVS space here - mainly as it is a different project from Ant - but sourceforge.org will host it. I think you will find that most of these elements will be rarely useful outside small builds thou. Remember opensource is about scratching what itches - you found an itch so scratch it. There is little point in repeatedly saying the same thing over as you will just get ignored. Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
